| Title | Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie |
| Volume | 53 |
| Pages | 310–342 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"296","_score":null,"_source":{"id":296,"authors_free":[{"id":433,"entry_id":296,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":296,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"53","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013342"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Averroès et les "averroïstes" dans le traité Sur l'éternité des choses de Nicolas d'Autrécourt |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Published in | Nicolas d'Autrécourt et la Faculté des Arts de Paris. Actes du Colloque de Paris, 19–21 mai 2005 |
| Pages | 253–276 |
| Categories | Latin Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1420","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1420,"authors_free":[{"id":1615,"entry_id":1420,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s et les \"averro\u00efstes\" dans le trait\u00e9 Sur l'\u00e9ternit\u00e9 des choses de Nicolas d'Autr\u00e9court","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s et les \"averro\u00efstes\" dans le trait\u00e9 Sur l'\u00e9ternit\u00e9 des choses de Nicolas d'Autr\u00e9court"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1420,"section_of":188,"pages":"253\u2013276","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":188,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Nicolas d'Autr\u00e9court et la Facult\u00e9 des Arts de Paris. Actes du Colloque de Paris, 19\u201321 mai 2005","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":188,"pubplace":"Cesena","publisher":"Stilgraf Editrice","series":"Quaderni di \"Paideia\"","volume":"4","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Du phantasme à l'espèce intelligible. La ruine d'Averroès par "l'averroïste" Jean de Jandun |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Published in | Intellect et Imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale. Actes du XIe Congrès International de Philosophie Médiévale de la Société Internationale pour l'Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale (S.I.E.P.M.) Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002 |
| Pages | 1179–1190 |
| Categories | Psychology, Latin Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1482","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1482,"authors_free":[{"id":1696,"entry_id":1482,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Du phantasme \u00e0 l'esp\u00e8ce intelligible. La ruine d'Averro\u00e8s par \"l'averro\u00efste\" Jean de Jandun","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Du phantasme \u00e0 l'esp\u00e8ce intelligible. La ruine d'Averro\u00e8s par \"l'averro\u00efste\" Jean de Jandun"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1482,"section_of":208,"pages":"1179\u20131190","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":208,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Intellect et Imagination dans la Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale. Actes du XIe Congr\u00e8s International de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Internationale pour l'\u00c9tude de la Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale (S.I.E.P.M.) Porto, du 26 au 31 ao\u00fbt 2002","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Intellect and Imagination in Medieval Philosophy","short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":208,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Rencontres de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"11","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages | 69–96 |
| Categories | Psychology, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averroïsme de Thomas de Strasbourg |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 641–663 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg († 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, who with Hervé Nédellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44408930 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1716","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1716,"authors_free":[{"id":1981,"entry_id":1716,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg"},"abstract":"In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg (\u2020 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pour\u00e7ain, who with Herv\u00e9 N\u00e9dellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44408930","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1716,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"90","issue":"4","pages":"641\u2013663"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica |
| Volume | 98 |
| Pages | 467–487 |
| Categories | Psychology |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43063729 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1487","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1487,"authors_free":[{"id":1709,"entry_id":1487,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43063729","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1487,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica","volume":"98","issue":null,"pages":"467\u2013487"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 53–86 |
| Categories | Psychology |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the "double subject", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a "theory" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term "subiectum" applied to the image and to show that the expression "duo subiecta", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two "substrates" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1559,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e"},"abstract":"According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the \"double subject\", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a \"theory\" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term \"subiectum\" applied to the image and to show that the expression \"duo subiecta\", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two \"substrates\" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"53\u201386"}},"sort":[2005]}
| Title | Transferts du sujet. La noétique d'Averroès selon Jean de Jandun |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2003 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | J. VRIN |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1235","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1235,"authors_free":[{"id":1422,"entry_id":1235,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Transferts du sujet. La no\u00e9tique d'Averro\u00e8s selon Jean de Jandun","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Transferts du sujet. La no\u00e9tique d'Averro\u00e8s selon Jean de Jandun"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"2003","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1235,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"J. VRIN","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2003]}
| Title | Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 310–348 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| L'article examine la reprise que le « prince des Averroïstes » Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285–1328) fait de cette phrase délicate d'Averroès, tirée de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : « forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore ». On cherche à montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interprétation du maître ès arts s'écarte radicalement de la pensée du Cordouan qu'il prétend suivre. Tandis qu'Averroès suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irréaliste l'idée d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne « sujet » pour « lieu », soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des différents penseurs en activité sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achevée, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle menée par Dante au début de sa Monarchia, permet deux révisions : d'une part, l'idée d'un « averroïsme » latin réactionnaire, se contentant de répéter les paroles du maître, est à revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases théoriques de l'idéal éthico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26170063 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"295","_score":null,"_source":{"id":295,"authors_free":[{"id":432,"entry_id":295,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"L'article examine la reprise que le \u00ab prince des Averro\u00efstes \u00bb Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285\u20131328) fait de cette phrase d\u00e9licate d'Averro\u00e8s, tir\u00e9e de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : \u00ab forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore \u00bb. On cherche \u00e0 montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre \u00e8s arts s'\u00e9carte radicalement de la pens\u00e9e du Cordouan qu'il pr\u00e9tend suivre. Tandis qu'Averro\u00e8s suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irr\u00e9aliste l'id\u00e9e d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne \u00ab sujet \u00bb pour \u00ab lieu \u00bb, soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des diff\u00e9rents penseurs en activit\u00e9 sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achev\u00e9e, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle men\u00e9e par Dante au d\u00e9but de sa Monarchia, permet deux r\u00e9visions : d'une part, l'id\u00e9e d'un \u00ab averro\u00efsme \u00bb latin r\u00e9actionnaire, se contentant de r\u00e9p\u00e9ter les paroles du ma\u00eetre, est \u00e0 revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases th\u00e9oriques de l'id\u00e9al \u00e9thico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26170063","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":295,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de th\u00e9ologie et philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"68","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013348"}},"sort":[2001]}
| Title | Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 310–348 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| L'article examine la reprise que le « prince des Averroïstes » Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285–1328) fait de cette phrase délicate d'Averroès, tirée de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : « forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore ». On cherche à montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interprétation du maître ès arts s'écarte radicalement de la pensée du Cordouan qu'il prétend suivre. Tandis qu'Averroès suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irréaliste l'idée d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne « sujet » pour « lieu », soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des différents penseurs en activité sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achevée, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle menée par Dante au début de sa Monarchia, permet deux révisions : d'une part, l'idée d'un « averroïsme » latin réactionnaire, se contentant de répéter les paroles du maître, est à revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases théoriques de l'idéal éthico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26170063 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"295","_score":null,"_source":{"id":295,"authors_free":[{"id":432,"entry_id":295,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"L'article examine la reprise que le \u00ab prince des Averro\u00efstes \u00bb Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285\u20131328) fait de cette phrase d\u00e9licate d'Averro\u00e8s, tir\u00e9e de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : \u00ab forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore \u00bb. On cherche \u00e0 montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre \u00e8s arts s'\u00e9carte radicalement de la pens\u00e9e du Cordouan qu'il pr\u00e9tend suivre. Tandis qu'Averro\u00e8s suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irr\u00e9aliste l'id\u00e9e d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne \u00ab sujet \u00bb pour \u00ab lieu \u00bb, soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des diff\u00e9rents penseurs en activit\u00e9 sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achev\u00e9e, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle men\u00e9e par Dante au d\u00e9but de sa Monarchia, permet deux r\u00e9visions : d'une part, l'id\u00e9e d'un \u00ab averro\u00efsme \u00bb latin r\u00e9actionnaire, se contentant de r\u00e9p\u00e9ter les paroles du ma\u00eetre, est \u00e0 revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases th\u00e9oriques de l'id\u00e9al \u00e9thico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26170063","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":295,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de th\u00e9ologie et philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"68","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013348"}},"sort":["Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Relation as Key to God’s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tahāfut al- tahāfut and the Damīma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghazālī and Avicenna |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–26 |
| Categories | Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes’ Tahāfut al-tahāfut and Ḍamīma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, and the Commentator. In al-Ġazālī’s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge “in a universal way” is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-Ġazālī’s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5038","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5038,"authors_free":[{"id":5785,"entry_id":5038,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna"},"abstract":"This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes\u2019 Tah\u0101fut al-tah\u0101fut and \u1e0cam\u012bma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b, and the Commentator. In al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge \u201cin a universal way\u201d is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1017\/S0957423919000109","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5038,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"20","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201326"}},"sort":["Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna"]}
| Title | S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 215–247 |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":["S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"]}
| Title | Siger de Brabant et la notion d’operans intrinsecum: un coup de maître? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3–36 |
| Categories | Siger of Brabant, Latin Averroism, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect’s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas’ noetic, the “intrinsic operant” is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5302","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5302,"authors_free":[{"id":6128,"entry_id":5302,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"},"abstract":"The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect\u2019s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas\u2019 noetic, the \u201cintrinsic operant\u201d is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.971.0003 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5302,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"97","issue":"1","pages":"3\u201336"}},"sort":["Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"]}
| Title | Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Vrin |
| Categories | Avicenna, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet , Laurent Cesalli |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Nous avons souhaité ce livre pour rendre hommage à Alain de Libera et fêter son travail. Celles et ceux qui écrivent ici sont des maîtres, des pairs, des collègues, d’anciens étudiants; en divers sens, ce sont tous des amis. Plutôt que d’imposer une présentation, nous avons choisi comme ordre le hasard alphabétique des noms, sans chapitres. Deux consignes seulement avaient été fournies. La brièveté, d’abord – quelques pages, tenues par un nombre de signes. L’absence de notes, ensuite, pour livrer des textes de plain-pied. Restait, pour évoquer l’œuvre et la personne d’Alain de Libera, l’objet, l’angle. Nous n’avions cette fois indiqué qu’une chose, qui donne à ce volume son titre : sujet libre. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5082","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5082,"authors_free":[{"id":5845,"entry_id":5082,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":5846,"entry_id":5082,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Laurent Cesalli","free_first_name":"Laurent ","free_last_name":"Cesalli","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera"},"abstract":"Nous avons souhait\u00e9 ce livre pour rendre hommage \u00e0 Alain de Libera et f\u00eater son travail. Celles et ceux qui \u00e9crivent ici sont des ma\u00eetres, des pairs, des coll\u00e8gues, d\u2019anciens \u00e9tudiants; en divers sens, ce sont tous des amis.\r\nPlut\u00f4t que d\u2019imposer une pr\u00e9sentation, nous avons choisi comme ordre le hasard alphab\u00e9tique des noms, sans chapitres. Deux consignes seulement avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 fournies. La bri\u00e8vet\u00e9, d\u2019abord \u2013 quelques pages, tenues par un nombre de signes. L\u2019absence de notes, ensuite, pour livrer des textes de plain-pied.\r\nRestait, pour \u00e9voquer l\u2019\u0153uvre et la personne d\u2019Alain de Libera, l\u2019objet, l\u2019angle. Nous n\u2019avions cette fois indiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019une chose, qui donne \u00e0 ce volume son titre : sujet libre.","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5082,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Vrin","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera"]}
| Title | Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica |
| Volume | 98 |
| Pages | 467–487 |
| Categories | Psychology |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43063729 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1487","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1487,"authors_free":[{"id":1709,"entry_id":1487,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43063729","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1487,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica","volume":"98","issue":null,"pages":"467\u2013487"}},"sort":["Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Transferts du sujet. La noétique d'Averroès selon Jean de Jandun |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2003 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | J. VRIN |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1235","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1235,"authors_free":[{"id":1422,"entry_id":1235,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Transferts du sujet. La no\u00e9tique d'Averro\u00e8s selon Jean de Jandun","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Transferts du sujet. La no\u00e9tique d'Averro\u00e8s selon Jean de Jandun"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"2003","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1235,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"J. VRIN","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Transferts du sujet. La no\u00e9tique d'Averro\u00e8s selon Jean de Jandun"]}
| Title | Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie |
| Volume | 53 |
| Pages | 310–342 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"296","_score":null,"_source":{"id":296,"authors_free":[{"id":433,"entry_id":296,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":296,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"53","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013342"}},"sort":["Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"]}
| Title | ابن رشد المقلق |
| Transcription | Ibn Rushd al-muqliq |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | Beirut |
| Publisher | dār al-kitāb al- jadīd al-muttaḥid |
| Categories | Biography, Law, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet , Georges Zainaty |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5412","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5412,"authors_free":[{"id":6275,"entry_id":5412,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":6276,"entry_id":5412,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Georges Zainaty","free_first_name":"Georges","free_last_name":"Zainaty","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0644\u0642\u202c ","title_transcript":"Ibn Rushd al-muqliq","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0644\u0642\u202c "},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2019","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5412,"pubplace":"Beirut","publisher":"d\u0101r al-kit\u0101b al- jad\u012bd al-mutta\u1e25id","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["\u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0644\u0642\u202c "]}